Who is buying, and what is next
What an agency has bought, from whom, at what value, and on what cycle. Contracts coming up for renewal are the pipeline nobody has published yet.
No new dashboard. Claude connects to the source data and answers there.
Notification is the easy half of the problem and the half everyone sells. Tell me when something matching these keywords appears. Fine, except keywords are a poor proxy for relevance in procurement, where the same requirement is described four different ways depending on which agency wrote it and which decade their template dates from.
Describing what you bid on to Claude in plain English works better than a keyword string, because the description survives the vocabulary changing. Ask what has been published recently that fits the kind of work you do, and the match is made against the substance of the notice. Then ask whether the buyer has run something similar before, and the notification becomes a decision.
There is a reason to prefer this to another alerting product, beyond the matching. Alerts are only useful if somebody reads them, and inboxes are where alerts go to be ignored. A question asked inside the assistant your team already has open is asked when someone is actually paying attention, which is the difference between an alert and a notification that works.
What an agency has bought, from whom, at what value, and on what cycle. Contracts coming up for renewal are the pipeline nobody has published yet.
The suppliers who keep winning in a category, with their award history and estimated win rate. Know the incumbent before you commit a team to the response.
Awarded contract records with values and dates. Price against evidence of what this buyer has paid before, not against a guess.
Open opportunities across every covered portal, filtered by the criteria your team actually qualifies on.
Four questions, so the conversation is useful. We come back to you directly.
This short form needs JavaScript. You can still get in touch directly.
Book a time