Procurement Context Talk to us

Government tender and contract data

Tender writing has moved to AI. The context you give it is what decides.

Procurement Context connects the AI your team already uses to live tenders, awarded contracts and supplier records across the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The drafting was never the hard part. The data is.

Talk to us How it connects
  • Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot and any MCP client
  • Connected once, current at every query
  • Renewals and award histories, visible before the tender drops

The shift

The writing moved first. The data is moving now

Two years ago bid teams drafted responses by hand. Now the drafting happens with AI, and the tooling has standardised: MCP is the connector Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot and most enterprise AI tools already use to reach external data. What has not moved yet, for most teams, is the data those drafts depend on. It still lives in portal tabs and spreadsheets.

The new workflow

What connected teams do differently

  • Check the incumbent and the buyer's award history in chat, before anyone commits to a response
  • Watch contracts coming up for renewal instead of waiting for the tender to drop
  • Price against what the buyer has paid before, cited to the award record
  • Carry claims into the bid with the public source attached

The gap

What waiting looks like

There is no countdown. The portals stay public and the connection will work next year. What moves is the work itself: a renewal you did not see gives the incumbent a head start measured in months, and every qualification your team does by hand is a morning someone else now spends on the response.

The on-ramp

How it connects

  1. 01

    It plugs into the AI you already have

    Procurement Context runs as an MCP server. That is the standard Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot and most enterprise AI tools already use to reach external data. Connecting is a configuration step, not an integration project.

  2. 02

    Your team asks in plain English

    "Which agencies bought facilities management in Queensland last year, and who won?" No query language, no CSV export, no new interface for anyone to learn.

  3. 03

    The answer cites the record

    Responses come back with the underlying notice or award attached, so a claim you carry into a bid traces to a public source an evaluator can check.

Coverage

If it's public, we cover it

Coverage is portal-agnostic. We have a system for standing up a new portal quickly, so any public procurement source is effectively already covered. Tell us where you tender and we will confirm it.

Portals our customers ask for most

North America

  • SAM.gov (US federal)
  • Cal eProcure
  • NYS Contract Reporter
  • CanadaBuys
  • BC Bid

United Kingdom

  • Find a Tender
  • Contracts Finder
  • Public Contracts Scotland
  • Sell2Wales

Europe

  • TED (pan-EU)
  • e-Vergabe (Germany)
  • BOAMP and PLACE (France)
  • TenderNed (Netherlands)

Australia

  • AusTender (federal)
  • buy.nsw
  • Buying for Victoria
  • QTenders
  • Tenders WA
  • SA Tenders and Contracts
  • Tasmanian Government Tenders
  • Tenders ACT
  • Quotations and Tenders Online (NT)

New Zealand

  • GETS

Asia Pacific

  • GeBIZ (Singapore)
  • GeM (India)

Hover or tap a market to match it to its portals.

Not an exhaustive list. Commercial aggregators such as VendorPanel and TenderLink are covered too, alongside the public sources above.

We have all started using AI to write our tenders. But good data to use as context is still the hard part, and it is the part that decides whether the bid was worth writing at all.

Tell us what you would want it to answer.

Four questions, so the conversation is useful. We come back to you directly.

This short form needs JavaScript. You can still get in touch directly.

Book a time

Questions

Do we have to use MCP?
No. MCP is how it connects to Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot and most enterprise AI tools, and for most teams that is the fastest route because the client is already on their desks. There is a direct API if you are building something of your own, and we can run scheduled briefs into email or Slack if you would rather the answers came to you.
Which portals do you cover?
If a portal is public and publishing, we cover it. We have a system for standing up a new source quickly, so coverage is not limited to a fixed list. The examples above are the ones customers ask for most. Tell us where you tender and we will confirm what is already running.
Where does the data come from?
Public tender portals and award registers: notices, awarded contracts, contract values and supplier records, as published by the buying organisations themselves. Every response cites the underlying record.
How accurate are the win rates and revenue figures?
They are estimates derived from public award records, and we present them as estimates. A supplier's public awards are a floor, not a full picture: private work and subcontracting never reach a register. It is enough to tell you who the serious incumbents are and how often they win.
How is this different from a tender alert service?
Alert services tell you what is open. The harder question is what has already been awarded, to whom, and for how much. That is what tells you whether a bid is worth writing. Procurement Context covers both, and it answers questions rather than sending you a list.

Tell us what you would want it to answer.

Four questions, so the conversation is useful. We come back to you directly.

Talk to us