Which jurisdictions does the tender data cover?

The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, along with a number of others. Coverage is portal-agnostic rather than tied to a fixed list: if a source is public it can be stood up quickly, so tell us the markets you sell into and we will confirm what is already running.

Which MCP clients can connect?

Any of them. MCP is a protocol rather than an integration with a particular vendor, so Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot all work, as does anything else that speaks it. That is the point of building on MCP rather than shipping our own application.

Is this just search, or does it include awarded contracts?

Both. Open tenders tell you what is available now; awarded contracts tell you whether bidding is worth the effort, who the incumbent is and what the work went for. Most teams find the award history changes more decisions than the opportunity feed does.

How do we get access?

Talk to us. The service is sold rather than self-served, so we set up the connection with you and confirm the sources you need are covered before anything is switched on.

An MCP server for tenders

One connection puts tenders inside the AI your team already uses.

Talk to sales

The tender data problem is not access. Every jurisdiction publishes its notices, and most publish them well. The problem is that the records live in as many places as there are buyers, each with its own search, its own categories and its own idea of what counts as a closing date. A team selling into four markets is checking four portals, and the fifth thing they miss is usually the one that mattered.

This is an MCP server, so the records arrive inside the assistant your team already uses rather than in another tab. Ask what has opened in your categories this week across the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and the answer is assembled from the published notices. Ask which buyer issued it and what they have bought before, and that comes back too, because opportunity and award history sit in the same place.

MCP matters here for a specific reason: it means there is no interface to adopt. No dashboard for your bid team to learn, no seats to provision, no export to reconcile against the portal it came from. The connection goes into Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot or whatever else your organisation has standardised on, and the tender data behaves like something the assistant simply knows.

Use cases

Who is buying, and what is next

What an agency has bought, from whom, at what value, and on what cycle. Contracts coming up for renewal are the pipeline nobody has published yet.

Who you are up against

The suppliers who keep winning in a category, with their award history and estimated win rate. Know the incumbent before you commit a team to the response.

What the work goes for

Awarded contract records with values and dates. Price against evidence of what this buyer has paid before, not against a guess.

What is live right now

Open opportunities across every covered portal, filtered by the criteria your team actually qualifies on.

Tell us what you would want it to answer.

Four questions, so the conversation is useful. We come back to you directly.

This short form needs JavaScript. You can still get in touch directly.

Book a time

Questions

Which jurisdictions does the tender data cover?: The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, along with a number of others. Coverage is portal-agnostic rather than tied to a fixed list: if a source is public it can be stood up quickly, so tell us the markets you sell into and we will confirm what is already running.
Which MCP clients can connect?: Any of them. MCP is a protocol rather than an integration with a particular vendor, so Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot all work, as does anything else that speaks it. That is the point of building on MCP rather than shipping our own application.
Is this just search, or does it include awarded contracts?: Both. Open tenders tell you what is available now; awarded contracts tell you whether bidding is worth the effort, who the incumbent is and what the work went for. Most teams find the award history changes more decisions than the opportunity feed does.
How do we get access?: Talk to us. The service is sold rather than self-served, so we set up the connection with you and confirm the sources you need are covered before anything is switched on.