Does this cover federal defense solicitations and awards?

Yes. Open contract opportunities and awarded contract records both sit in the dataset, including the buying agency, the winning supplier and the value where it is published. For most capture teams the award side is the more useful half, because it is what tells you whether a bid is realistic.

Can I research subcontracting and teaming targets?

You can see which suppliers have won work in a category and for which buyers, which is how most teams build a shortlist of primes worth approaching. It is a read of the public award record, not a relationship database. What you do with the shortlist is your call.

Does it include state level defense and military related buying?

Coverage is portal-agnostic and not limited to federal sources. State and local procurement records sit alongside federal ones, which matters for suppliers selling into installations, facilities and support services. Tell us which sources you need and we will confirm what is covered.

What AI tools does it work with?

Any MCP client, including Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot. There is no separate application, so your team asks questions in the assistant they already have open.

Defense contracts in the United States

Current opportunities, past awards, and the suppliers already winning them.

Talk to sales

US defense contracting rewards the supplier who understands the incumbency picture before the solicitation drops. By the time a notice is public, the requirement has usually been shaped, the incumbent has been performing it for years, and the realistic question is whether anyone else is genuinely in contention. Working that out means reading award history across services and agencies, which is a different lookup from the one that surfaced the opportunity.

We put both behind the same question. Connect Procurement Context to your AI assistant and ask which commands have bought a capability, which primes have won it, and how often the requirement has been recompeted. The answer comes from the solicitation and award records rather than a briefing deck. There is no portal to learn and no saved search to keep current as your capability set changes.

That shifts effort to the part that matters. Capture teams burn weeks on pursuits that were never open, and the signals that would have told them so are sitting in public records. Repeat winners in a category, contract vehicles that keep getting extended, and set-aside patterns that quietly exclude you are all readable if getting to them does not cost an afternoon.

Use cases

Who is buying, and what is next

What an agency has bought, from whom, at what value, and on what cycle. Contracts coming up for renewal are the pipeline nobody has published yet.

Who you are up against

The suppliers who keep winning in a category, with their award history and estimated win rate. Know the incumbent before you commit a team to the response.

What the work goes for

Awarded contract records with values and dates. Price against evidence of what this buyer has paid before, not against a guess.

What is live right now

Open opportunities across every covered portal, filtered by the criteria your team actually qualifies on.

Tell us what you would want it to answer.

Four questions, so the conversation is useful. We come back to you directly.

This short form needs JavaScript. You can still get in touch directly.

Book a time

Questions

Does this cover federal defense solicitations and awards?: Yes. Open contract opportunities and awarded contract records both sit in the dataset, including the buying agency, the winning supplier and the value where it is published. For most capture teams the award side is the more useful half, because it is what tells you whether a bid is realistic.
Can I research subcontracting and teaming targets?: You can see which suppliers have won work in a category and for which buyers, which is how most teams build a shortlist of primes worth approaching. It is a read of the public award record, not a relationship database. What you do with the shortlist is your call.
Does it include state level defense and military related buying?: Coverage is portal-agnostic and not limited to federal sources. State and local procurement records sit alongside federal ones, which matters for suppliers selling into installations, facilities and support services. Tell us which sources you need and we will confirm what is covered.
What AI tools does it work with?: Any MCP client, including Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot. There is no separate application, so your team asks questions in the assistant they already have open.